REPORT: NOAA releases internal memo criticizing ‘political’ influence on Hurricane Dorian controversy

Sign up for our newsletter
BY TEAM DML / SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 /

GET the DML NEWS APP (FREE) Click Here

Below is a report that DML News App gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by CNN.com:

Washington (CNN) — The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on Tuesday released an internal email sent by the agency’s acting chief scientist announcing that he will investigate why the agency backed President Donald Trump’s false claim that Hurricane Dorian was likely to hit Alabama.

The memo’s public release — it had been originally sent to NOAA staff on Sunday, according to a copy obtained by CNN — marks the latest development in the controversy surrounding Trump’s false assertion about Dorian’s path. On Friday, NOAA had disavowed a tweet from the National Weather Service’s Birmingham, Alabama, office contradicting Trump’s claim.

The article goes on to state the following:

“I am pursuing the potential violations of our NOAA Administrative Order on Scientific Integrity,” acting Chief Scientist Craig McLean wrote in the memo. “My understanding is that this intervention to contradict the forecaster was not based on science but on external factors including reputation and appearance, or simply put, political.”

“If the public cannot trust our information, or we debase our forecaster’s warnings and products, that specific danger arises,” McLean wrote.
Here is the memo:

A Message from Craig McLean: Hurricane Dorian and Exceptional Service

Dear Colleagues,

The fierce storm we know as Hurricane Dorian has concluded its ferocious path through the Bahamas and along the U.S. East Coast. Many of you have contributed to the excellent science that has underpinned the forecasts and current understanding of storms such as this one, which accelerated quite rapidly in intensity. The storm also presented challenges in track which improved with enhanced observations. We know that our collective work, from the scientists in the aircraft penetrating the storm, to the scientists deploying the glider picket line, to the modelers and folks working the physics of the storms, across OAR and in our CI’S, and across all NOAA Lines, we are working the problem in order to give the NWS forecasters the best tools we possibly can to keep America and our neighbors safe. Thank you.

During the course of the storm, as I am sure you are aware, there were routine and exceptional expert forecasts, the best possible, issued by the NWS Forecasters. These are remarkable colleagues of ours, who receive our products, use them well, and provide the benefit of their own experience in announcing accurate forecasts accompanied by the distinction of all credible scientists—they sign their work. As I’m sure you also know, there was a complex issue involving the President commenting on the path of the hurricane. The NWS Forecaster(s) corrected any public misunderstanding in an expert and timely way, as they should. There followed, last Friday, an unsigned press release from “NOAA” that inappropriately and incorrectly contradicted the NWS forecaster. My understanding is that this intervention to contradict the forecaster was not based on science but on external factors including reputation and appearance, or simply put, political. Our NOAA Scientific Integrity Policy and Code of Scientific Conduct make clear that all NOAA employees shall approach all scientific activities with honesty, objectively, and completely, without allegiance to individuals, organizations, or ideology. The content of this press release is very concerning as it compromises the ability of NOAA to convey life-saving information necessary to avoid substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. If the public cannot trust our information, or we debase our forecaster’s warnings and products, that specific danger arises.

You know that the value of our science is in the complexity of our understanding, our ability to convey that understanding to a wide audience of users of this information, and to establish and sustain the public trust in the truth and legitimacy of that information. Unfortunately, the press release of last Friday violated this trust and violated NOAA’s policies of scientific integrity. In my role as Assistant Administrator for Research, and as I continue to administratively serve as Acting Chief Scientist, I am pursuing the potential violations of our NOAA Administrative Order on Scientific Integrity. Thankfully, we have such policies that are independently cited as among the best in the federal community, if not the best. Your NOAA and OAR management and leadership team believes in these policies and principles. I have a responsibility to pursue these truths. I will.

Thank you for your continued excellent work, and your trust. Carry on.

Craig N. McLean
Assistant Administrator
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

To get more information about this article, please visit CNN.com. To weigh in, leave a comment below.

DML News App offered you the above aggregated article preview as part of our ongoing effort to educate and inform people around the world about news, events, and politics. We encourage you to obtain additional information by visiting CNN.com

Sign up for our newsletter

GET the DML NEWS APP (FREE) Click Here

4 Comments

  1. DG September 10th, 2019 at 9:16 pm

    Enough with this ongoing stupidity of controversy.. MOVE ON ALREADY .. the epitome of beating a dead horse .for the love . you sick SOB’s .. Move the F on .. nobody gives a RATS ASS & I for one .. sick of hearing this ongoing BS… imho.. 🙄🙄🙄🙄

    Reply

  2. Barbara September 10th, 2019 at 9:47 pm

    Ditto, DG.

    Reply

  3. James Baker September 10th, 2019 at 10:09 pm

    Now we have stupid at NOAA. What a waste of money. No wonder they missed calling the Bahamas sooner .

    Reply

  4. Jay September 10th, 2019 at 11:02 pm

    I don’t get any of this… I saw the same map the president saw because when I saw the original projected path I called my boyfriend and said the hurricane is projected to go across Florida right where we are looking at properties and if had gone that course it would have been heading for Alabama… so that’s the problem I saw it too

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *