CLAIM: Lawsuit alleges Trump campaign paid women less than men

Sign up for our newsletter
BY TEAM DML / MAY 14, 2019 /

GET the DML NEWS APP (FREE) Click Here

Below is a report that DML News App gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by TheHill.com:

A court filing Monday alleges President Trump’s 2016 campaign paid woman employees, including former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman, less than men.

The filing, which was part of a broader lawsuit, cites an analysis it says found that, except for a “small handful” of senior employees, woman campaign employees were paid an average of $3,865 per month compared to an average of $4,568 for men, an 18.2 percent gap.

The article goes on to state the following:

The lawsuit alleges the Trump campaign “maintained a common policy … of paying female employees less than their male counterparts for the same or similar work.”

Former Trump campaign worker Alva Johnson, who filed the original suitearlier this year in federal court in Tampa, Florida, alleges discrimination on the basis of gender and race.

In the filing, Johnson asks to be named the lead plaintiff for a collective action by other former Trump campaign employees alleging they were paid less than their male counterparts. The lawsuit claims she was paid $3,000 a month between January and August 2016 and $4,000 for the remainder of her time with the campaign, which it says was “considerably less than that paid to male Campaign staff who had the same responsibilities as she did and lower even than male Campaign staff who had fewer responsibilities than she did.”

Show your support for President Trump!

To get more information about this article, please visit TheHill.com. To weigh in, leave a comment below.

DML News App offered you the above aggregated article preview as part of our ongoing effort to educate and inform people around the world about news, events, and politics. We encourage you to obtain additional information by visiting TheHill.com

Sign up for our newsletter

GET the DML NEWS APP (FREE) Click Here

3 Comments

  1. Anthony Sesack May 14th, 2019 at 9:00 am

    I would think your SALARY is based on your level of EXPERIENCE. Not based on whether you have a penis or a vagina.
    If you’re working on a campaign staff, and have ZERO experience, I would think MINIMUM WAGE is what you’re getting.

    Reply

  2. Capit May 14th, 2019 at 10:16 am

    Omarosa needs to get a life. Experience, not an unexperienced person gets paid more. Has nothing to do with gender. How stupid is Omarosa the gold digger?

    Reply

  3. john May 14th, 2019 at 10:34 am

    if you accept the position for an agreed upon wage, you got no gripe

    Reply

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *